|
ATTACHMENT 3 (Revised 8/96)
SUGGESTED FORMAT FOR NON-COMPETING
CONTINUATION APPLICATIONS FOR
NCI CLINICAL TRIALS COOPERATIVE GROUP
PROGRAM COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS
The annual non-competing continuation (Type-5) cooperative
agreement application serves as a report to the funding agency on
the achievements of the awardee in the previous funding period
and presents the plan of activity for the upcoming funding period
along with the associated cost projections. The application is
due two months prior to the anniversary date of the Group award.
Separate applications are required for each cooperative
agreement supported by NCI, and thus are usually submitted from
the headquarters office, the statistical/data management office
and from those funded member institutions with individual
cooperative agreements. For Cooperative Groups which have merged
functions in one way or another into fewer cooperative
agreements, each activity should be separately reported in the
relevant application along with its associated budget. Each
application begins with the face page and the detailed budget
pages as described in the Instructions for the PHS 2590 (Rev.
5/95), Application for Continuation of a PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
GRANT. The budget presentations for the separate components
should be in accord with the support recommended on the NIH
Notice of Grant Award for the continuation period and in
sufficient detail to assure that NCI staff (CTEP and GAB) are
advised of proposed budget commitments. For allowable
expenditures see Clinical Trials Cooperative Group Program
Guidelines.
A. GROUP HEADQUARTERS/STATISTICAL OFFICE APPLICATION(S)
Please prepare the Group Headquarters/Statistical Office
cooperative agreement application(s) according to Instructions
for the PHS
2590 (Rev. 5/95) except as noted below:
1. BUDGETS AND BUDGET JUSTIFICATIONS (Form Page 2 and Form
Page 3)
The budget section should begin with summary budget pages,
followed by separate detailed budgets and justifications for each
component or activity including separate budgets/tables for
individual consortia. (See Section II VII.2.B. Headquarters
(Operations Office) Budget).
2. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING FORM PAGE 3, THE FOLLOWING IS
REQUIRED:
a. On-site Auditing Activities
The NCI-CTMB Guidelines for On-Site Monitoring of Clinical
Trials for Cooperative Groups and CCOP Research Bases require all
institutions to be audited at least once every 36 months. In
order for NCI staff to review each the Group's compliance with
this requirement, each Group should conduct a comprehensive
review of its current membership and provide in the non-competing
continuation application an accounting in tabular format (see
suggested format - Attachment 4) for all institutions to include:
(1) date of affiliation with or termination from the Group; (2)
accrual for the immediate preceding 36 months broken down by
year; (3) the projected accrual for the upcoming year; (4) the
date of the institution's
last audit; and (5) the date (projected month/year) of the next
proposed audit.
In addition, please provide the following information
related to the costs of conducting the audits:
- For the immediately preceding budget period, the actual
total costs (direct and associated indirect) charged to
the Headquarters or Statistical Center, as appropriate.
- For the correct budget period, the estimated total costs
(direct and associated indirect) charged to the
Headquarters or Statistical Center, as appropriate. If
all audits have been completed, please provide the actual
total costs charged.
- For the upcoming budget period, the estimated total costs
(direct and associated indirect) for conducting the
planned audits.
- Please provide this information in the Budget
justification section. The information may be provided in
the format of the Group's choosing.
b. If the Headquarters provides funds to performance sites
for accruals (including High Priority and Minority Accrual
Initiatives) via per patient reimbursement mechanisms, (e.g.,
purchased service agreements or subcontracts), the following
information must be provided:
- For the current budget period, (i) a list of performance
sites that received funds to date in that year; and (ii)
the total costs provided to each site (direct and
indirect) to date in that year; and (iii) the number of
patients accrued for each site to date in that year.
- For the immediately preceding budget period, (i) a list
of performance sites that received funds to date in that
year; and (ii) the total costs provided to each site
(direct and indirect) to date in that year; and (iii) the
total number of patients accrued in that year for each
site.
- For the upcoming budget period, (i) the estimated number
of accruals and (ii) the estimated total costs (direct
and indirect) for each performance site.
The above information may be provided in the format of the
Group's choosing and should follow the budget justification
section of the application.
3. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH (Form Page 4)
Include biographical sketches for new participants in
administrative and scientific leadership roles only.
Limit to two pages each.
4. OTHER SOURCES OF SUPPORT FOR THE GROUP
- Include in the listing all sources of support (both NCI
and non-NCI) for the Group's headquarters and/or
statistical office for all research activities. For that
support which is linked to specific studies, indicate
which studies receive this support, the associated dollar
amounts and the nature of any costs not normally
supported by NCI.
- Unmet funding needs: Outline in detail funding needs
beyond those which can be met by the Group's committed
budget for the upcoming year and which the Group feels
are required for its continued function; describe the
justification precisely. Requests for additional funds
must be for efforts within the Group's approved work
scope. How would additional funding affect the quality of
research currently in progress? What new initiatives
would be possible? Would this represent a one-time
request or a continuing obligation?
5. PROGRESS REPORT SUMMARY (Form Page 5) -
ORGANIZATION OF THE APPLICATION ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING
FORMAT IS SUGGESTED:
a. ADMINISTRATIVE
- Achievements: Briefly describe the Group's
significant achievements in the past year in its
administrative activities. These might include:
organizational or structural aspects, data management
practices and procedures, statistical approaches,
compliance with regulatory requirements, quality
assurance practices, efficiencies in protocol
development, growth in membership, educational
activities, etc., including changes in primary personnel,
their roles and responsibilities.
- Proposed Activities: Outline planned new
initiatives in terms of organizational and administrative
activities for the upcoming year for the Group as a
whole.
- Special Emphasis Issues:
- Scientific prioritization - Describe the process
used by the Group for setting priorities regarding the
use of (limited) Group resources to accomplish its
approved work scope.
- Ethics and integrity in the conduct of clinical
research -
- ethics training - Describe current Group
procedures for education of Group members
regarding the ethical requirements of clinical
trials research, including the mechanism (such as
the Affirmation of Integrity statement) by which
the Group assures that all its members who handle
clinical trials data know the Group policy
towards scientific misconduct.
- conflict of interest policy - Briefly describe
Group policies and procedures regarding the
evaluation of potential conflicts of interest.
Include a table listing Group members to whom the
conflict of interest policies are applicable,
stating their position in the Group.
- procedures in the event of scientific misconduct
- Describe Group procedures in the event of
detection of scientific misconduct. Describe the
instructions given Group members regarding
reporting concerns about possible scientific
misconduct
- Quality of Group data - Describe mechanisms in
place which provide quality control of the data set used
for Group analyses.
- Data and Safety Monitoring Committees - Briefly
describe how decisions made by the Group Phase III Data
and Safety Monitoring Committee(s) are made independently
from study coordinators and involved investigators.
Describe the composition of the DSMC.
- Group membership and accrual - Describe the
following:
- Group membership categories, including a complete
list, by membership categories, of all
performance sites.
- Overall accrual to Group studies, separated into
therapeutic and non-therapeutic study categories.
- Inclusion of women and minorities in clinical
trials research. Total Group patient accrual by
study shall be reported in the parent Cooperative
Group application in accordance with the
guidelines for the PHS 2590 (Rev 5/95), pages
8-9, using the table on Form Page 5. Describe,
where relevant, initiatives to improve access by
underserved populations to clinical trials
participation.
- Accrual to NCI-designated High Priority Trials,
if relevant.
- Outreach efforts, including accrual through the
Group's utilization of the Cooperative Group
Outreach Program (CGOP) and Community Clinical
Oncology Program (CCOP) mechanisms, if relevant.
4) Outline the Group's most important problems and proposed
solutions.
b. COOPERATIVE GROUP COMMITTEES AND LABORATORIES - PROGRESS
REPORT
(organized by Committee: include all committee and laboratory
progress reports in the Headquarters application)
- Achievements - Summarize the most significant
achievements in the past year for each committee or
laboratory (limit to one page per committee)
- Review of studies - Briefly describe new findings and
changes in the status of committee studies.
- Membership - Briefly describe changes in the membership
of each committee focusing particularly on changes in
leadership responsibilities.
- Plans - Briefly discuss changes in the research focus of
each committee including projected new initiatives,
future directions, and priorities.
- To aid in the review of your application information for
each committee or laboratory should be arranged in a
tabular format as shown in sample tables 1 - 3.
c. BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Arrange in tabular form such as shown in sample table 4,
the Group Bibliography, beginning with the most recent
publications, abstracts and presentations. Attach any
additional pages required to complete the bibliography.
Do not include publications which had complete citations
in a previous application.
- Arrange in tabular form such as shown in sample table 5,
a complete listing of manuscripts and abstracts which
have been submitted but not yet published.
d. PERFORMANCE REVIEW
- Describe the process by which the performance of each
participating institution (members, affiliates, CCOPs,
CGOPs, etc.,) is assessed. Include the current ranking of
participants by these criteria. How has the evaluation
impacted on the funding of the participants?
- List all institutions against which disciplinary action
(probation, suspension of registration, etc.,) was taken
on the basis of a site visit, performance review, etc.
Describe circumstances leading to the action and the
nature of the action taken.
e. ACCRUAL TABLES
The Headquarters application should provide two types of
accrual tables summarizing Group activities (see suggested
formats, attached). The first should provide total Group accrual
displayed by protocol [sample tables 1 (therapeutic) and 2
(non-therapeutic)]; the second should provide total Group accrual
displayed by performance site [sample tables 6 (therapeutic) and
7 (non-therapeutic)].
For sample table 1, Intergroup studies should be separated
into two categories: a) those studies for which the Group serves
as the coordinating center, and b) the additional studies to
which the Group contributes patients. The Intergroup coordinating
center is asked to provide in its application complete accrual
information for the study with a breakdown by the contributing
Groups. A participating Group other than the coordinating center
is asked to provide in its application information limited to
that Group's activities.
Sample tables 6 and 7 should contain accrual data for the
entire Group, in tabular form such that the accrual for each
member and its affiliated performance sites are displayed without
duplication. Data for performance sites affiliated directly with
the Group Headquarters should be displayed with the notation
"Headquarters" where the member's name would otherwise
be displayed.
Please note that applications from individual Group
institutions holding cooperative agreements are to include sample
tables 6 and 7 specific for that institution and its affiliates.
The Group statistical center should provide the information to
the member institution for inclusion in its application.
6. GENDER AND MINORITY INCLUSION (Form Page 5)
The Table on Form Page 5 must be filled out in accordance with
the instruction in Section A. 5. a. 3) e) iii) above.
B. GROUP MEMBER INSTITUTION APPLICATIONS
In some Groups, member institutions receive cooperative
agreements directly from NCI, thus requiring separate grant
applications to be submitted by the member institution with the
guidance of the Group leadership. Please prepare the member
institution applications according to the Instructions for the PHS 2590
(Rev. 5/95),
Application for Continuation of a PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE GRANT,
except as noted below:
- Briefly describe any changes in institutional profile,
personnel, or affiliations relevant to the accrual of
patients onto Group studies.
- Discuss the scientific contribution of the member
institution in terms of specific study leadership, pilot
study contribution, authorship, Group meeting
participation, etc.
- Briefly describe the participation of personnel in
administrative activities of the Group.
- The member institution application should include tables
displaying institutional/affiliate accrual to therapeutic
(Table 6) and non-therapeutic (Table 7) Group protocols
by Phase; these should be prepared by the Group
statistical office and supplied to the member institution
for inclusion in the application.
- Gender and Minority Inclusion: Patient contribution by
study will be reported in the parent Cooperative Group
application in accordance with the instructions in the
PHS 2590, Rev 5/95, therefore, institutional applicants
are not required to report the study population by
protocol. However, the table at the bottom of Form Page 5
of the PHS 2590 should be filled in, providing a summary
of institutional accrual to Group studies for the
following time period: either a) the twelve month period
ending one month before the receipt date of this
application, or b) the most recent calendar year.
Institutional applications should discuss special
resources which it provides to the Group in terms of
special patient populations and affiliations. Include
minority and medically under-served populations, as
appropriate. Please provide written explanations of local
demographics or other obstacles which may influence the
ability of your institution to recruit women and minority
patients in representative proportions, and efforts to
overcome such obstacles.
- Budget and Budget Justification: Complete in accord with
the instruction sheet for PHS 2590 (Rev. 5/95).
Applicants requesting awards which are larger than the
committed level should provide detailed justification for
any increases and should enclose a supporting letter from
the Group Chairperson.
Back to Contents
|